Ann Child Neurol Search

CLOSE


Ann Child Neurol > Volume 30(4); 2022 > Article
Lim, Hwang, Lee, and Kwon: The Wide Variety of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis in Children: A Clinical Perspective

Abstract

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an acute demyelinating inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. It is characterized by encephalopathy, multifocal neurological deficits, and typical magnetic resonance imaging findings of widespread demyelinating lesions, predominantly involving the white matter of the brain and spinal cord. ADEM mainly affects children and is commonly associated with preceding viral and bacterial infections, and, rarely, vaccinations. Despite substantial advances in the understanding of the association of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody with recurrent forms of ADEM or other demyelinating conditions, specific etiologic agents or biological markers have not been identified. Therefore, the diagnosis of ADEM is still based on clinical and radiological findings and the exclusion of other conditions mimicking ADEM. However, a prompt diagnosis and adequate treatment are crucial because diagnostic delays or inappropriate treatment may lead to unwanted neurological sequelae in some children. There is no standardized treatment protocol for ADEM, but the use of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis has been associated with good clinical outcomes. Adequate treatment has reportedly resulted in favorable outcomes, with full or almost full recovery in most children with ADEM, although some children may develop neurological sequelae, such as cognitive impairment and motor deficits. Further studies are needed to identify biological clues and optimal treatment protocols to minimize the incidence of neurological sequelae.

Introduction

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an acute or subacute immune-mediated demyelinating inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). It is characterized by encephalopathy with multifocal neurological deficits and characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of widespread demyelination, predominantly involving the white matter of the brain and spinal cord, and mostly occurs after recent viral or bacterial infections [1-4]. It is predominantly diagnosed in children, is usually monophasic, and often resolves within 3 months of treatment. The International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Society Group (IPMSSG) made enormous efforts to create consensus clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria for ADEM in 2013 (Table 1) [5]. In addition, the discovery of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab) and understanding of its association with recurrent forms of ADEM, such as multiphasic ADEM (MDEM), have made its diagnosis and management possible [6-8]. Despite these advances, the diagnosis is still made based on clinical and MRI findings, and minimal modifications have been made in the treatment protocol over these years. Although the overall prognosis is usually favorable, some patients with ADEM might develop neurological sequelae such as cognitive impairment, motor deficits, visual problems, and epilepsy [9-11]. Relapse can occur in a minority of children with ADEM, although there are gray zones between relapsing ADEM and other neuroinflammatory demyelinating conditions, such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG-Ab-associated disorders (MOGAD). This review focuses on the current knowledge and recent advances in the management of pediatric ADEM.

Epidemiology

ADEM can occur at any age, but predominantly develops in childhood and adolescence. Its annual incidence is estimated to be 0.3 to 0.6 cases per 100,000 children with a mean age of 5 to 8 years at presentation [2,4,12]. Previous studies have reported a slight male preponderance, with male-to-female ratios ranging from 1:0.8 to 2.3:1 [13]. Its incidence is highest in winter and spring [12]. It is also more common with increasing distance from the equator, similar to multiple sclerosis (MS) [2]. ADEM is now considered a form of autoimmune encephalitis. It often occurs after infection or, rarely, after vaccination. In 50% to 86% of cases, ADEM is reportedly preceded by an acute infectious illness such as upper respiratory infections, gastroenteritis, and rarely an exanthematous disease due to various agents [1,4,12,14]. Clinical symptoms typically begin within 2 days to 3 weeks after an infectious event [12]. The most frequent associated infections are viral infections, but bacteria or other agents have also been implicated (Table 1) [2,12,14-19]. Pediatric ADEM cases after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 have also been reported [20,21]. Vaccinations have been implicated as a triggering factor for ADEM in 4% to 18% of cases [1]. Almost all vaccines have been implicated; however, no clear causal association has been proven (Table 1). Reportedly, the first vaccination is more likely to trigger ADEM than subsequent vaccinations [22].

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of ADEM remains unclear, but may involve an immune-mediated inflammatory process triggered by infection or vaccination in genetically predisposed individuals. Previous studies have proposed that some children with certain human leukocyte antigen subtypes are more likely to develop ADEM [23-25]. Molecular mimicry between antigenic determinants of neurotropic viruses or other causative agents and myelin agents such as myelin basic protein (MBP) and MOG is considered a putative mechanism underlying immune-mediated neuronal injury [2,26,27]. Another theory is non-specific self-sensitization of reactive T cells (bystander activation) against myelin proteins resulting from infectious antigens [28]. This reactivation makes it possible for T cells to migrate through glial limitans and enter the brain parenchyma. The production of cytokines and chemokines by antigen-presenting cells and activated T cells contributes to further recruitment, which boosts migration into the CNS of additional immune cells, such as T cells and macrophages. Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier is also caused by the release of proteases from activated T cells, mast cells, and monocytes. Furthermore, T cells possibly play a secondary role in other inflammatory processes that can cause demyelination and axonal injury [29]. The autoimmune hypothesis is also supported by the fact that anti-MOG-Abs have been identified in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the acute phase in 36% to 60% of children with ADEM, which progressively declines during the recovery phase [30,31]. High and persistent MOG-immunoglobulin G titers are usually associated with relapsing forms of MOGAD [31-33]. However, it remains uncertain whether anti-MOG-Abs are causative agents or byproducts of extensive myelin degradation in ADEM or other demyelinating diseases.

Clinical/diagnostic perspectives

1. Clinical features

The initial symptoms typically begin within 2 days to 3 weeks of infection or vaccination. The clinical presentation is diverse; however, patients with ADEM typically show non-specific prodromal symptoms, such as fever, malaise, headache, nausea, and vomiting shortly before neurological symptoms or signs. The clinical course is characterized by rapid progression and development of maximum deficits within a few days [12]. Neurological manifestations typically begin with encephalopathy, characterized by altered consciousness, such as irritability, lethargy, coma, and abnormal behavior, which are associated with focal or multifocal neurological deficits depending on the lesions. In addition, they can present with masquerading symptoms or signs, such as fever, seizures, and meningeal irritation, resembling meningoencephalitis. ADEM can affect any part of the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves, meaning that it can present with any type of neurological symptoms. Common neurological symptoms include pyramidal signs, cranial neuropathy, speech impairment or aphasia, sensory deficits, visual disturbances, ataxia, and spinal cord signs (Table 2). Children with anti-MOG-Abs tend to have multifocal neurological symptoms but show complete resolution after steroid treatment [4]. Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission is required in 15% to 25% of children with ADEM, mainly due to respiratory failure, which results from coma, brainstem involvement, and status epilepticus [1,6,34]. Combined central and peripheral demyelination is also common in children. However, a further diagnostic work-up can be performed to screen for other conditions, such as metachromatic leukodystrophy and Krabbe disease in certain cases. ADEM is typically a monophasic condition but can show a relapsing form described as “recurrent” if the lesions are always the same, or “multiphasic” if the space and time of the lesions are widely dispersed. This relapsing form, such as MDEM, appears to be related to high and persistent MOG-Ab titers [4,31,32].

2. Neuroimaging features

Because there are no specific biomarkers for diagnosis, MRI is still the most sensitive technique for diagnosing ADEM. Brain MRI in the acute phase typically shows diffuse, bilateral, randomly distributed, large (1 to 2 cm), patchy or tumor-like, often heterogeneous, poorly demarcated hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences [12,26]. Both white and gray matter are affected. When the deep gray matter is affected, it is more likely to be symmetrical and often involves the thalami and basal ganglia. Apart from these lesions, other patterns have been reported in pediatric ADEM (Table 3) [1,12,35]. Fig. 1 demonstrates various patterns of MRI lesions in pediatric patients with ADEM. Brain MRI may show subtle or no abnormalities in the early phase of ADEM. This type of delay should be taken into consideration if the case is clinically suggestive of ADEM, but the initial MRIs do not show any abnormal findings [36,37]. Spinal cord involvement has been reported in 18% to 80% of children with ADEM, and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) involving at least three vertebral body segments in length has been detected in 60% to 100% of patients [1]. Children with anti-MOG-Ab positive ADEM are at a higher risk of LETM [32]. Gadolinium enhancement is reported in 18% to 50% of patients [1,6]. There have been conflicting results regarding MRI diffusion patterns. However, no restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient map with high values consistent with vasogenic edema were found in 75% of patients [1]. Verifying the resolution of lesions in serial MRI studies can play a crucial role in bolstering the initial diagnosis of ADEM.

3. Laboratory findings

There are no laboratory tests specific to ADEM. Many tests are useful in ruling out other neurological conditions. CSF findings are usually non-specific, including mild pleocytosis with lymphocyte predominance and slightly elevated protein levels. Oligoclonal bands, the only established biomarker of MS, are detected in 0% to 20% of patients with ADEM [1]. Although there are no specific biomarkers for ADEM, serum anti-MOG-Ab and anti-aquaporin 4 antibody (anti-AQP4-Ab) tests are useful in certain cases. Anti-MOG-Ab was detected in approximately 33% to 66% of pediatric ADEM cases and 96% of ADEM cases that developed a relapsing form of demyelination [1]. Anti-AQP4-Abs are specific for NMOSD, a major type of ADEM that mimics demyelinating disorders. A case-control study showed 91% sensitivity and 100% specificity for anti-AQP4-Abs in NMOSD [38].

4. Electroencephalography

Electroencephalography (EEG) is often performed in pediatric ADEM because of seizures or altered consciousness at presentation. The most common abnormal finding is non-specific, diffuse slowing in 80% to 88% of patients [39-41]. Focal epileptiform discharges are identified in 15% to 25% of patients [39-41]. It seems that there are no significant associations between EEG findings and clinical features, or between abnormal EEG findings and epilepsy development [1].

5. ADEM subtypes

Based on the relapse and time course of ADEM, the IPMSSG has proposed an operational definition for ADEM and its variants [5]. Although debated, ADEM subtypes include ADEM, MDEM, ADEM-optic neuritis (ADEM-ON), and exceptionally acute hemorrhagic encephalomyelitis (AHEM) (Table 4). Monophasic ADEM refers to a single ADEM episode with no further demyelinating events or new MRI findings. If a relapse occurs within the first 3 months of the initial episode, it is still considered the same episode. MDEM indicates two or more episodes of ADEM separated by at least 3 months. ADEM-ON is monophasic or MDEM with one or more recurrent episodes of optic neuritis. AHEM is a severe, fatal form of ADEM with rapid deterioration and poor outcomes, and it is associated with multifocal hemorrhages and necrosis in addition to typical demyelinating lesions. Death can occur within 24 hours of onset due to severe brain edema or herniation. These diagnoses are not final because ADEM is a heterogeneous entity that can evolve into other types. As a result, it must be considered whether patients develop additional attacks or unusual presentations that are remote from the initial episode.

6. Diagnosis

The diagnosis is still based on clinical and radiological findings and the exclusion of other conditions mimicking ADEM because there are no specific biomarkers for confirmation. The IPMSSG proposed updated diagnostic criteria for ADEM in 2013, even though the criteria are still limited in certain cases (Table 5) [5]. Taking a good history and performing a thorough physical examination are the most important first steps in the diagnosis. Children with ADEM typically present with acute encephalopathy with various multifocal neurological deficits a few days to weeks after infection or vaccination. During the acute phase, brain MRI typically diffuses bilaterally and is poorly demarcated, with large (1 to 2 cm), hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences. Compared with adults with ADEM, MRI more often shows thalamic and basal ganglia lesions in children, and typically periventricular lesions in adults [42]. Any clinical and radiological findings occurring within 3 months of onset are considered part of the initial episode. In other words, no new clinical or MRI findings should emerge 3 months or more after the first episode of typical ADEM. When two or more episodes occur, other conditions, such as MDEM, MOG-Ab-associated disease, MS, and NMOSD, should be considered. Lumbar puncture for CSF analysis is required to rule out other ADEM-mimicking conditions, such as CNS infections.
Antibody testing, such as anti-MOG-Ab and anti-AQP4-Ab, can help define subtypes of other demyelinating disorders that are distinct from MS (Fig. 2). Demonstrating the resolution of initial MRI lesions in follow-up studies can be a supplementary method for the diagnosis of ADEM.

7. Differential diagnosis

The diagnosis of ADEM is mainly based on clinical and radiological findings owing to the lack of specific biomarkers. As a result, diagnosis often requires the exclusion of a wide variety of ADEM-mimicking conditions. Many acquired demyelination diseases and other inflammatory or non-inflammatory conditions may show similar clinical and radiological features and should be considered in terms of the differential diagnosis (Table 6).
First, potentially treatable viral or bacterial CNS infections should be ruled out. When a patient presents with movement disorders, seizures, altered consciousness, or other neuropsychiatric symptoms a few days to weeks after an infection or vaccination, autoimmune encephalitis such as anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis should be considered. Besides other immune-mediated demyelinating disorders, stroke-like episodes potentially indicate CNS vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, moyamoya disease/syndrome, or rarely, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes. Bilateral thalamic involvement may be observed in children with ADEM, but it can also be noted in children with acute necrotizing encephalopathy or deep cerebral venous infarction. Bilateral basal ganglia involvement can be observed in toxic, metabolic, or genetic disorders. Bilateral cortical and subcortical lesions, predominantly in the parieto-occipital lobes, are indicative of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, especially in children who are exposed to hypertension or immunosuppressive agents. If the clinical course progressively worsens, CNS tumors or genetic disorders should be considered.

Treatment

Since there are no randomized placebo-controlled studies on the treatment of ADEM, treatment protocols are mainly based on expert opinions and observational studies. Symptom-based supportive care is important because of its onset at any age or stage of illness. Supportive care can be provided together with curative treatment. Treatment with antiviral agents and antibiotics is generally accepted because ADEM mimics CNS infection.
The standard protocol is a non-specific immunosuppressive therapy including corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), plasma exchange (PE), and other immunomodulatory agents. Despite the lack of convincing evidence, first-line treatment usually involves a short course of high-dose corticosteroids. The most widely used protocol consists of methylprednisolone administered at 10 to 30 mg/kg/day to a maximum dose of 1 g/day or dexamethasone administered at 1 mg/kg/day, followed by oral prednisone at 1 mg/kg/day and tapered over 4 to 6 weeks [12,43,44]. In cases where corticosteroids yield poor results, IVIGs can be administered as an alternative treatment, which is administered at a total dose of 2 g/kg administered either as a single dose or divided doses over 2 to 5 days [1,12,45]. Another alternative is PE, which is usually used in children who fail to respond to corticosteroids or IVIGs (Fig. 2). PE usually involves 3 to 6 cycles with widely different protocols, and the clinical response is usually obvious after 2 to 3 exchanges [46,47]. Cyclophosphamide can be used in patients in whom conventional treatment fails, and other disease-modifying drugs such as azathioprine, mycophenolate, and rituximab can be favorable in children with recurrent MOG-Ab-positive demyelinating syndromes such as MDEM and ADEM-ON. However, clinical evidence is limited for children with ADEM [1,48].

Prognosis

The long-term overall outcome of ADEM is usually favorable because most children with ADEM respond to conventional treatment. Full recovery with normal neurological examination occurs in approximately 50% to 80% of patients, and minor neurological deficits, such as clumsiness and mild hemiparesis, are reported in 20% to 30% of patients [1,4,12]. Long-term cognitive and behavioral problems such as lower intelligence quotient, difficulties in executive function, memory impairment, and attention deficits are reported in up to 56% of patients [1,4,9,12]. According to a prior study, 22% of patients with ADEM had seizures during the acute presentation and 16.2% developed epilepsy afterward. Post-ADEM epilepsy was more frequently observed in children with relapsing disease than in those with monophasic disease and in MOG-Ab-positive children than in MOG-Ab-negative cases [49]. Although debate continues whether relapsing ADEM, called MDEM, is MOGAD or possibly NMOSD, the relapsing form has been reported in less than 10% of children with ADEM [6]. Almost a quarter of hospitalized patients with ADEM were in a critical condition and required admission to the PICU, with a mortality rate of 1% to 3% [4,6,34].

Future perspective

ADEM is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS that mostly affects children after viral or bacterial infections, or rarely after various vaccinations. The exact pathogenesis of ADEM remains unclear, although non-specific self-sensitization of reactive T cells against myelin proteins, such as MBP and myelin oligodendrocyte protein, and molecular mimicry of infectious agents are currently considered the predominant pathogenic mechanisms. Despite advances in MOG-Ab and other neurobiological clues, the diagnosis is still based on clinical and radiological findings and the exclusion of other conditions mimicking ADEM. Further studies are needed to identify any biological clues that can define the subtypes of ADEM and distinguish ADEM from other types of ADEM that mimic demyelinating diseases. Since conclusive data on the optimal treatment of ADEM and its outcomes are still lacking, well-designed collaborative multicenter studies are required to achieve the best results and minimize neurological sequelae.

Conflicts of interest

Soonhak Kwon is an editor-in-chief of the journal, but he was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Notes

Author contribution

Conceptualization: HL, SKH, YJL, and SK. Data curation: HL and SK. Formal analysis: YJL and SK. Methodology: HL, SKH, YJL, and SK. Project administration: HL, SKH, YJL, and SK. Visualization: SK. Writing-original draft: HL and SK. Writing-review & editing: SK.

Fig. 1.
Various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in children with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). A 14-month-old girl presented with sleepiness after a 2-day history of fever and runny nose. Axial T2-weighted imaging shows diffuse, bilateral, large (1 to 2 cm), confluent, tumefactive lesions in the subcortical white matter (WM), basal ganglia, and thalami (A). A 10-year-old boy presented with right-sided focal motor seizures 3 days after an upper respiratory infection. Axial T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences reveal multiple wedge-shaped hyperintense lesions in the subcortical WM of the left parieto-temporal (B) and right frontal lobes (C). Follow-up MRI 6 weeks after treatment shows an almost complete resolution of the lesions (D). A 4-year-old boy presented with altered consciousness after a 3-day history of fever. Axial T2-weighted sequences reveal diffuse symmetrical T2/FLAIR hyperintensities at the bilateral thalami, basal ganglia, periventricular, subcortical WM, and cerebellar WM with no evidence of hemorrhage (E).
acn-2022-00220f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) in children.
LP, lumbar puncture; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; WM, white matter; MP, methylprednisolone; DEX, dexamethasone; PO, per os; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; PE, plasma exchange; CP, cyclophosphamide; OCB, oligoclonal bands; MS, multiple sclerosis; NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; PRES, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; MELAS, mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes syndrome; anti-MOG-Ab, anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody; anti-AQP4-Ab, anti-aquaporin 4 antibody; MDEM, multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis.
acn-2022-00220f2.jpg
Table 1.
Causative agents of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Infections Vaccines
Bacteria: Borrelia burgdorferi, Campylobacter jejuni, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Leptospira, Legionella pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Rickettsia, beta-hemolytic Streptococcus Diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus, hepatitis B, influenza, Japanese B encephalitis, measles, mumps, rubella, pneumococcus, polio, rabies, SARS-CoV-2, smallpox, varicella
Viruses: Coronavirus/SARS-CoV-2, Coxsackie virus, CMV, EBV, dengue virus, hepatitis A virus, HHV-6, HIV, HSV, influenza virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, measles virus, rubella virus, varicella zoster virus, West Nile virus, Zika virus
Others: Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium falciparum, Cryptococcus neoformans

SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; HHV-6, human herpesvirus 6; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HSV, herpes simplex virus.

Table 2.
Clinical/neurological features of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Encephalopathy: sleepiness/irritability to coma
Fever
Headache
Seizures
Meningeal irritation signs
Cranial neuropathy
Pyramidal signs, unilateral or bilateral
Ataxia
Optic neuritis
Bladder insufficiency
Sensory deficits, unilateral or bilateral
Table 3.
Various magnetic resonance imaging patterns of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Diffuse, bilateral, large, confluent, tumor-like lesions with perilesional edema
Bilateral, small isolated subcortical white matter lesions
Periventricular white matter lesions
Cortical gray matter lesions
Cerebral white matter lesions with bilateral thalamic or basal ganglia involvement
Cerebral white matter lesions with cerebellum, brainstem, or spinal cord involvement
Diffuse, bilateral, symmetrical leukodystrophy-like white matter lesions
Black holes/T1 hypointensities
Hemorrhagic pattern within the large, confluent white matter lesions
Table 4.
Subtypes of ADEM
Monophasic ADEM: A single ADEM episode with no further demyelinating events or new MRI lesions
Multiphasic ADEM: Two episodes of ADEM separated by at least 3 months in timea
ADEM-ON: Monophasic or multiphasic ADEM plus one or more recurrent episodes of optic neuritisb
AHL/AHEM: A severe fulminant form of ADEM with rapid deterioration and poor outcomes; associated with multifocal hemorrhages and necrosis in addition to typical demyelinating lesions

ADEM, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ADEM-ON, ADEM-optic neuritis; AHL, acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis; AHEM, acute hemorrhagic encephalomyelitis.

a The second attack at least 3 months after the initial attack, along with new lesions or three or more attacks, suggests the ultimate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, or other disorders;

b No other demyelinating attacks occur. Monophasic ADEM is followed by recurrent optic neuritis in the vast majority of cases, which seems to be associated with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein.

Table 5.
Diagnostic criteria for ADEM
1. A first polyfocal, clinical, CNS event with presumed inflammatory demyelinating cause
2. Encephalopathy not explained by fever, systemic illness, or postictal symptoms
3. Brain MRI is abnormal during the acute (3 months) phase
4. No new clinical or MRI findings emerge 3 months or more after onset
5. Brain MRI is abnormal during acute (3 months) phase with diffuse, poorly demarcated, large (1-2 cm) lesions involving predominantly cerebral WM. T1 hypointense lesions in WM are rare. Deep GM lesions in the thalamus or basal ganglia can be present

Adapted from the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Society Group (IPMSSG) Diagnostic Criteria for ADEM, 2013.

ADEM, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; CNS, central nervous system; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; WM, white matter; GM, gray matter.

Table 6.
Differential diagnosis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Meningoencephalitis/encephalitis: viral (HSV, EBV, CMV, HIV), bacterial, parasitic
Immune: autoimmune encephalitis (anti-NMDAR-Ab)
Inflammatory demyelinating: MS, NMO
Vascular/vasculitis: moyamoya disease, SLE, etc.
Toxic/metabolic/hypoxic/radiation induced
Neoplastic: multicentric glioma, glioblastoma multiforme, CNS lymphoma, histiocytosis
Others: PRES, MELAS, ANE, etc.

HSV, herpes simplex virus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; anti-NMDAR-Ab, anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody; MS, multiple sclerosis; NMO, neuromyelitis optica; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; CNS, central nervous system; PRES, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; MELAS, mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes syndrome; ANE, acute necrotizing encephalopathy.

References

1. Cole J, Evans E, Mwangi M, Mar S. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children: an updated review based on current diagnostic criteria. Pediatr Neurol 2019;100:26-34.
crossref pmid
2. Massa S, Fracchiolla A, Neglia C, Argentiero A, Esposito S. Update on acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children and adolescents. Children (Basel) 2021;8:280.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Otallah S. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children and adults: a focused review emphasizing new developments. Mult Scler 2021;27:1153-60.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Paolilo RB, Deiva K, Neuteboom R, Rostasy K, Lim M. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: current perspectives. Children (Basel) 2020;7:210.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Krupp LB, Tardieu M, Amato MP, Banwell B, Chitnis T, Dale RC, et al. International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group criteria for pediatric multiple sclerosis and immune-mediated central nervous system demyelinating disorders: revisions to the 2007 definitions. Mult Scler 2013;19:1261-7.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Pohl D, Alper G, Van Haren K, Kornberg AJ, Lucchinetti CF, Tenembaum S, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: updates on an inflammatory CNS syndrome. Neurology 2016;87(9 Suppl 2):S38-45.
crossref pmid
7. Hacohen Y, Absoud M, Deiva K, Hemingway C, Nytrova P, Woodhall M, et al. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies are associated with a non-MS course in children. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e81.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Hacohen Y, Mankad K, Chong WK, Barkhof F, Vincent A, Lim M, et al. Diagnostic algorithm for relapsing acquired demyelinating syndromes in children. Neurology 2017;89:269-78.
crossref pmid
9. Hahn CD, Miles BS, MacGregor DL, Blaser SI, Banwell BL, Hetherington CR. Neurocognitive outcome after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Pediatr Neurol 2003;29:117-23.
crossref pmid
10. Anlar B, Basaran C, Kose G, Guven A, Haspolat S, Yakut A, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children: outcome and prognosis. Neuropediatrics 2003;34:194-9.
crossref pmid
11. Christensen PS, Ostergaard JR. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: definition, treatment, prognosis and evidence. Ugeskr Laeger 2008;170:1839-42.
pmid
12. Tenembaum SN. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Handb Clin Neurol 2013;112:1253-62.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Parrish JB, Yeh EA. Acuted disseminated encephalomyelitis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012;724:1-14.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Lee YJ. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children: differential diagnosis from multiple sclerosis on the basis of clinical course. Korean J Pediatr 2011;54:234-40.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Wan Sulaiman WA, Inche Mat LN, Hashim HZ, Hoo FK, Ching SM, Vasudevan R, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in dengue viral infection. J Clin Neurosci 2017;43:25-31.
crossref pmid
16. Abe T, Kojima K, Shoji H, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K, Uchida M, et al. Japanese encephalitis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:755-61.
crossref pmid
17. Bhardwaj U, Pandey N, Rastogi M, Singh SK. Gist of Zika virus pathogenesis. Virology 2021;560:86-95.
crossref pmid
18. Garg RK. Spectrum of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a review. Neurol India 2020;68:560-72.
crossref pmid
19. Garg RK, Paliwal VK. Spectrum of neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccination. Neurol Sci 2022;43:3-40.
crossref pmid pdf
20. de Miranda Henriques-Souza AM, de Melo AC, de Aguiar Coelho Silva Madeiro B, Freitas LF, Sampaio Rocha-Filho PA, Goncalves FG. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in a COVID-19 pediatric patient. Neuroradiology 2021;63:141-5.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Etemadifar M, Mansouri AR, Nouri H, Sedaghat N, Salari M, Maghsoudi M, et al. Post-COVID-19 acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: case report and review of the literature. Neuroimmunol Rep 2022;2:100066.
crossref
22. Karussis D, Petrou P. The spectrum of post-vaccination inflammatory CNS demyelinating syndromes. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:215-24.
crossref pmid
23. Alves-Leon SV, Veluttini-Pimentel ML, Gouveia ME, Malfetano FR, Gaspareto EL, Alvarenga MP, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: clinical features, HLA DRB1*1501, HLA DRB1*1503, HLA DQA1*0102, HLA DQB1*0602, and HLA DPA1*0301 allelic association study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009;67(3A):643-51.
crossref pmid
24. Oh HH, Kwon SH, Kim CW, Choe BH, Ko CW, Jung HD, et al. Molecular analysis of HLA class II-associated susceptibility to neuroinflammatory diseases in Korean children. J Korean Med Sci 2004;19:426-30.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Idrissova ZhR, Boldyreva MN, Dekonenko EP, Malishev NA, Leontyeva IY, Martinenko IN, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children: clinical features and HLA-DR linkage. Eur J Neurol 2003;10:537-46.
crossref pmid pdf
26. Tenembaum S, Chitnis T, Ness J, Hahn JS; International Pediatric MS Study Group. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neurology 2007;68(16 Suppl 2):S23-36.
crossref pmid
27. Wucherpfennig KW, Strominger JL. Molecular mimicry in T cell-mediated autoimmunity: viral peptides activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein. Cell 1995;80:695-705.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Ishizu T, Minohara M, Ichiyama T, Kira R, Tanaka M, Osoegawa M, et al. CSF cytokine and chemokine profiles in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol 2006;175:52-8.
crossref pmid
29. Sospedra M, Martin R. Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol 2005;23:683-747.
crossref pmid
30. Probstel AK, Dornmair K, Bittner R, Sperl P, Jenne D, Magalhaes S, et al. Antibodies to MOG are transient in childhood acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neurology 2011;77:580-8.
crossref pmid
31. Tenembaum SN. Pediatric demyelinating disease and anti‐MOG antibody. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol 2021;12:7-21.
crossref pdf
32. Baumann M, Hennes EM, Schanda K, Karenfort M, Kornek B, Seidl R, et al. Children with multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis and antibodies to the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG): extending the spectrum of MOG antibody positive diseases. Mult Scler 2016;22:1821-9.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Hennes EM, Baumann M, Schanda K, Anlar B, Bajer-Kornek B, Blaschek A, et al. Prognostic relevance of MOG antibodies in children with an acquired demyelinating syndrome. Neurology 2017;89:900-8.
crossref pmid
34. Absoud M, Parslow RC, Wassmer E, Hemingway C, Duncan HP, Cummins C, et al. Severe acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: a paediatric intensive care population-based study. Mult Scler 2011;17:1258-61.
crossref pmid pdf
35. Baum PA, Barkovich AJ, Koch TK, Berg BO. Deep gray matter involvement in children with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1275-83.
pmid pmc
36. Wong YY, van Pelt ED, Ketelslegers IA, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Hintzen RQ, Neuteboom RF, et al. Evolution of MRI abnormalities in paediatric acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2017;21:300-4.
crossref pmid
37. Honkaniemi J, Dastidar P, Kahara V, Haapasalo H. Delayed MR imaging changes in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1117-24.
pmid pmc
38. Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Misu T, Miyazawa I, Nakamura M, et al. Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain 2007;130(Pt 5):1235-43.
crossref pmid
39. Arktout S. Prognosis factors in children with ADEM: clinical, biological, and radiological features. Int J Radiol Imaging Technol 2020;6:063.
crossref
40. Erol I, Ozkale Y, Alkan O, Alehan F. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children and adolescents: a single center experience. Pediatr Neurol 2013;49:266-73.
crossref pmid pmc
41. Pavone P, Pettoello-Mantovano M, Le Pira A, Giardino I, Pulvirenti A, Giugno R, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: a long-term prospective study and meta-analysis. Neuropediatrics 2010;41:246-55.
crossref pmid
42. Ketelslegers IA, Visser IE, Neuteboom RF, Boon M, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Hintzen RQ. Disease course and outcome of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis is more severe in adults than in children. Mult Scler 2011;17:441-8.
crossref pmid pdf
43. Dale RC, de Sousa C, Chong WK, Cox TC, Harding B, Neville BG. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis in children. Brain 2000;123 Pt 12:2407-22.
crossref pmid
44. Hynson JL, Kornberg AJ, Coleman LT, Shield L, Harvey AS, Kean MJ. Clinical and neuroradiologic features of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children. Neurology 2001;56:1308-12.
crossref pmid
45. Sahlas DJ, Miller SP, Guerin M, Veilleux M, Francis G. Treatment of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis with intravenous immunoglobulin. Neurology 2000;54:1370-2.
crossref pmid
46. RamachandranNair R, Rafeequ M, Girija AS. Plasmapheresis in childhood acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Indian Pediatr 2005;42:479-82.
pmid
47. Miyazawa R, Hikima A, Takano Y, Arakawa H, Tomomasa T, Morikawa A. Plasmapheresis in fulminant acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Brain Dev 2001;23:424-6.
crossref pmid
48. Ayed H, Chaudhary MW, AlBaradie R, Mir A. Use of cyclophosphamide in a child with fulminant acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Child Neurol Open 2018;5:2329048X18754631.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
49. Rossor T, Benetou C, Wright S, Duignan S, Lascelles K, Robinson R, et al. Early predictors of epilepsy and subsequent relapse in children with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Mult Scler 2020;26:333-42.
crossref pmid pdf


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2072-2364    Fax: +82-2-743-3455    E-mail: editor@annchildneurol.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Child Neurology Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next