Ann Child Neurol Search

CLOSE


Ann Child Neurol > Volume 34(3); 2026 > Article
Oh, Lyu, Kong, Nam, Lim, Kim, Park, Jo, Kim, Yeon, and Lee: From Benign to Fulminant: Clinical Features and Fatal Outcomes of Influenza-Associated Encephalitis in Children

Abstract

Purpose

Influenza-associated encephalitis/encephalopathy (IAE) in children ranges from a mild, self-limited illness to rapidly fatal neurological deterioration. This study investigated the clinical features, treatment timing, and risk factors associated with mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes in pediatric IAE.

Methods

This retrospective study included 17 children diagnosed with IAE at a tertiary center between October 2025 and February 2026. IAE was defined by laboratory-confirmed influenza infection and clinical criteria for encephalitis after alternative etiologies had been excluded. Patients were categorized into three outcome groups: full recovery, mild-to-moderate sequelae, and mortality. Clinical characteristics were compared among the three groups and analyzed to identify potential risk factors associated with adverse neurological outcomes.

Results

Among the 17 patients (median age, 8.1 years), 10 recovered fully, four developed sequelae, and three died. Vaccination history differed significantly among the outcome groups (P=0.011); none of the patients who died had received influenza vaccination for at least 2 years before admission. Two fatal cases deteriorated abruptly within 12 hours after presentation and died before treatment could be initiated. The treatment interval differed significantly among the groups (P=0.003). In multivariable Firth models, treatment within 24 hours and prior vaccination showed protective trends, whereas brainstem involvement on magnetic resonance imaging and ventilator support were associated with increased odds of mortality; however, statistical significance was not reached.

Conclusion

Although many children with IAE recover completely, the disease can progress rapidly to fatal outcomes in a subset of patients. Prompt recognition, early treatment initiation, and prior influenza vaccination may reduce the risk of severe neurological complications.

Introduction

Influenza is a common viral infection in children and usually presents as a self-limited respiratory illness. Neurological complications associated with influenza have been increasingly reported over the past several decades. In recent hospitalized cohorts [1], seizures, including febrile, complex febrile, and acute symptomatic seizures, were the most common neurological manifestations, and many affected patients recovered rapidly. A French study similarly reported that most neurological presentations were transient and that febrile seizures or benign encephalopathy often resolved within a few days [2]. However, a subset of patients progressed to more severe phenotypes, including mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion, brainstem leukoencephalopathy, and acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE), often with subsequent neurological sequelae. A Thai cohort further reported that severe encephalopathy was associated with characteristic electroencephalography (EEG) patterns, including diffuse slowing and low-voltage background activity [3]. The most devastating phenotype, influenza-associated ANE, was recently described in a United States (U.S.) multicenter series conducted from 2023 to 2025, which reported a mortality rate of 27%, a median time to death of 3 days, and moderate-to-severe disability in 63% of survivors at 90-day follow-up [4].
Large cohort studies from Korea, the U.S., Thailand, and Europe have reported neurological complications in approximately 8% to 17% of hospitalized pediatric patients with influenza (Table 1) [1-6]. Although most children recover without long-term deficits, mortality rates ranging from 1% to more than 20% have been reported, particularly for severe phenotypes such as ANE [4,7]. Several studies have identified risk factors for influenza-associated neurological complications in children. In a U.S. study, neurological comorbidities increased the risk by nearly five-fold (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.6) [1]. A Thai cohort demonstrated increased risk among children with prior febrile seizures (aOR, 20.3), epilepsy (aOR, 3.6), and other neurological conditions [3]. A Korean multicenter study similarly reported underlying neurological disease as an independent predictor (aOR, 5.41) [5]. Young age has also been associated with an increased risk of neurological complications [1,5]. In addition, lack of seasonal influenza vaccination has been independently associated with neurological complications [1], and vaccination rates were notably low in ANE cases (16%) [4]. Nevertheless, the clinical course of influenza-associated encephalitis/encephalopathy (IAE) remains unpredictable, and some previously healthy children deteriorate rapidly despite mild initial symptoms.
Early antiviral therapy and immunomodulatory treatment are commonly used in moderate-to-severe cases. However, the optimal timing of these interventions and their influence on outcomes remain incompletely defined. In a U.S. pediatric cohort, early antiviral treatment was associated with fewer neurological complications, but definitive conclusions were limited by the study design and sample size [1]. In addition, although immunomodulatory therapies such as corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin have been reported in case series and cohort studies, evidence supporting their efficacy remains limited [2,3].
In this case series, we investigated the clinical spectrum, treatment timing, and risk factors associated with mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes in children with IAE at a tertiary pediatric center, with particular attention to rapidly progressive fatal cases.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients

This retrospective case series was conducted at Pusan National University Children’s Hospital between October 2025 and February 2026. Children presenting with influenza-like symptoms and laboratory-confirmed influenza infection were initially screened. Influenza infection was established by detection of influenza viral RNA in nasopharyngeal or endotracheal specimens using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). To minimize confounding by other infectious etiologies, respiratory specimens were concurrently tested and confirmed to be negative for other common respiratory viruses and bacteria, including adenovirus, coronavirus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, Bordetella pertussis, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Among patients with symptomatic influenza infection, those diagnosed with IAE were included in this study. Encephalitis was diagnosed in patients with altered mental status or perceptual disturbance lasting at least 24 hours without an identifiable alternative explanation. In addition, at least three of the following supportive criteria were required: (1) documented fever within 72 hours before or after neurological symptom onset; (2) new-onset seizures, either generalized or focal, not attributable to pre-existing epilepsy or other causes; (3) newly developed focal neurological deficits; (4) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (>5 white blood cells/mm³); (5) neuroimaging findings on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatible with encephalitic involvement; and (6) EEG abnormalities consistent with encephalitis and not explained by other etiologies. These criteria were adapted from established definitions of pediatric encephalitis [8]. IAE was diagnosed when a patient met the diagnostic criteria for encephalitis, had a positive influenza PCR result from a respiratory sample, and had no evidence of an alternative infectious etiology. Specifically, other known causes of viral or atypical encephalitis, including herpes simplex virus, enterovirus, Japanese encephalitis virus, and Mycoplasma species, were excluded by appropriate laboratory testing. To minimize confounding by underlying neurological conditions, patients with pre-existing progressive neurological disorders or incomplete medical records were excluded.
Based on clinical status determined by comprehensive neurological assessment at discharge, outcomes were categorized as full recovery, mild-to-moderate sequelae, or mortality: (1) full recovery, defined as return to the premorbid neurological baseline without residual deficits; (2) mild-to-moderate sequelae, defined as persistent neurological deficits or clinically significant systemic complications related to the acute illness; and (3) mortality, defined as death during hospitalization as a result of disease progression.

2. Diagnostic approach

In children presenting during the influenza season with fever accompanied by seizures, altered mental status, or other acute neurological symptoms, IAE was considered in the differential diagnosis. The initial evaluation included influenza PCR testing and routine laboratory studies. In patients with significant or persistent neurological symptoms, CSF analysis, EEG, and brain MRI or CT were performed to confirm encephalitic involvement and exclude alternative etiologies.
The severity of neurological impairment was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe based on a combination of clinical and electrophysiological findings, including mental status, seizure activity, need for intensive care support, and EEG abnormalities. Mild cases were defined as transient or mild alterations in mental status without persistent neurological deficits or significant EEG abnormalities. Moderate cases included sustained altered consciousness, recurrent seizures, or abnormal EEG findings requiring medical intervention. Severe cases were defined by rapidly progressive neurological deterioration, need for intensive care support, or life-threatening manifestations such as coma or refractory seizures. The diagnostic process is illustrated in Fig. 1.

3. Data collection and evaluation of IAE treatment outcomes

This study was conducted through retrospective chart review of eligible patients. Demographic characteristics, medical histories, and data on the pre-admission clinical course were obtained retrospectively from caregiver reports and documented medical records. The treatment interval was defined as the time from initial neurological symptom onset to initiation of antiviral and/or immunomodulatory therapy. In most patients, antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies were initiated concurrently; therefore, the treatment interval was analyzed as a combined measure rather than as separate intervention intervals. All clinical variables during hospitalization were extracted from medical records and independently reviewed by at least two pediatric specialists to ensure data accuracy. Information on influenza testing at admission and additional diagnostic evaluations, including CSF analysis and molecular testing for neurotropic pathogens, was obtained from recorded clinical data. Laboratory parameters were collected from official results documented in the hospital laboratory system. All molecular diagnostic procedures had been performed in a certified clinical laboratory according to standardized protocols and quality-control regulations.

4. Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using R software version 3.2.1 (meta package; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and all statistical tests were two-sided. Continuous variables are presented as means±standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges, depending on data distribution. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Owing to the small-sample size, comparisons among the three outcome groups—full recovery, mild-to-moderate sequelae, and mortality—were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality. Owing to the limited number of events and the possibility of separation bias, Firth’s penalized likelihood logistic regression was applied to reduce small-sample bias and provide more reliable estimates. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Univariate Firth logistic regression models were initially fitted for each candidate variable. Variables considered clinically relevant were subsequently entered into reduced multivariable models to avoid model overfitting. Given the exploratory nature of this study and the small number of outcome events, multivariable analyses were interpreted cautiously. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05 for all analyses.

5. Standard protocol approvals and patient consents

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (IRB number: 55-2026-060). Given the retrospective design and use of de-identified medical records, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. All patient data were anonymized before analysis to ensure confidentiality and privacy.

Results

1. Demographic and clinical profile of the patients

During the study period, 17 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria for IAE. The median age was 8.1 years (range, 2.7 to 15.7), and 64.7% of patients were male (Table 2). Patients were categorized into three groups according to discharge status: 10 patients (58.8%) achieved full neurological recovery; four (23.5%) developed mild-to-moderate sequelae, including epilepsy (n=2), hemiplegia secondary to cerebral infarction (n=1), and a systemic complication, namely newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus following diabetic ketoacidosis (n=1); and three patients (17.6%) died because of rapidly progressive neurological deterioration. No significant differences were observed among the three groups with respect to age, sex, or underlying neurological disease. The initial neurological symptoms, including seizures and altered mental status, were also comparable across groups. However, influenza vaccination history differed significantly among the mortality, sequelae, and recovery groups (0.0% vs. 50.0% vs. 100.0%, P=0.011) (Table 2). In particular, none of the patients in the mortality group had received influenza vaccination for at least 2 years before admission. Vaccination history was the only baseline medical characteristic that clearly distinguished the three outcome groups.
Laboratory parameters, including white blood cell count and C-reactive protein levels, did not differ significantly among the groups. Although aspartate aminotransferase levels tended to be higher in the mortality group, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.051) (Table 2). CSF analysis could not be performed in two of the three patients in the mortality group because of rapid clinical deterioration.

2. Treatment timing, clinical course, and severity

The treatment interval, defined as the time from initial neurological symptom onset to antiviral and/or immunomodulatory therapy administration, differed significantly among the three groups (P=0.003) (Table 2). Notably, two of the three patients in the mortality group were the first and second cases diagnosed with IAE at our hospital in 2025 (Table 3). Both fatal cases, cases 1 and 2, presented with multiple seizures and decreased mental status at admission, followed by rapid clinical deterioration. Laboratory findings showed markedly elevated aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate, and cardiac enzyme levels, suggesting multi-organ involvement. Brain CT demonstrated diffuse cerebral edema in both patients. During evaluation in the emergency department, both patients deteriorated abruptly and died within 12 hours of arrival, before CSF examination or appropriate antiviral or immunomodulatory therapy could be initiated. After these early catastrophic cases, institutional management was modified. In subsequent patients with suspected IAE, antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies were initiated promptly, often concurrently with ongoing diagnostic evaluations. In contrast to the mortality group, 80% of patients in the recovery group received treatment within 24 hours of presentation. This early treatment approach was not used in the initial fatal cases.
All patients in the mortality group required pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission and ventilator support; by comparison, only 25% of patients in the sequelae group and 20% of those in the recovery group required PICU admission and ventilator support (P=0.035) (Table 2). Length of hospitalization differed significantly among the groups (P<0.001), largely reflecting early death in the mortality group and prolonged admission among patients with sequelae.

3. Risk factors for mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes

Because only three deaths occurred during the study period, multivariable Firth-penalized logistic regression was applied to reduce small-sample bias and potential separation effects. In the multivariable model (Table 4 and Fig. 2A), brainstem involvement on MRI was associated with increased odds of death (OR, 5.34; 95% CI, 0.09 to 331.23), as was ventilator support (OR, 6.79; 95% CI, 0.12 to 370.55). In contrast, influenza vaccination (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.01 to 27.98) and treatment initiation within 24 hours of symptom onset (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.01 to 8.23) were associated with lower odds of mortality. However, none of these associations reached statistical significance, and the CIs were wide, reflecting the limited number of death events. These findings should therefore be interpreted as exploratory.
In analyses of predictors of unfavorable neurological outcomes, defined as mortality plus sequelae, influenza vaccination was associated with reduced odds of a poor outcome (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.00 to 6.19), and treatment within 24 hours showed a similar protective tendency (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.01 to 2.64) (Table 4 and Fig. 2B). Although no variable reached statistical significance, the direction of the estimates suggested that early treatment initiation and prior vaccination may be associated with a lower risk of unfavorable neurological outcomes.
To address the potential bias introduced by patients who died before treatment initiation, a sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding the two patients who died within 12 hours of presentation (Table 5). In this analysis, patients were reclassified into favorable-outcome (recovery) and unfavorable-outcome (sequelae plus mortality) groups. In multivariable Firth logistic regression, prior influenza vaccination (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.00 to 6.72) and treatment initiation within 24 hours (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.01 to 3.16) showed trends toward lower odds of an unfavorable outcome, whereas ventilator support was associated with higher odds (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.03 to 74.05). Brainstem involvement on MRI did not show a clear association (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.01 to 110.74). Although none of these associations reached statistical significance, the overall trends were similar to those in the primary analysis.

Discussion

This retrospective study demonstrated marked clinical heterogeneity in pediatric IAE, ranging from complete recovery to hyperacute, fulminant deterioration within hours. Among the 17 children, most recovered fully; however, 17.6% died and 23.5% developed sequelae. Notably, the two fatal cases deteriorated abruptly within hours of presentation, underscoring the potentially fulminant nature of the disease, even in previously healthy children. These findings are consistent with prior cohort studies reporting generally favorable outcomes but occasional catastrophic progression [1-7]. The mortality rate observed in this cohort was comparable to that reported in Asian cohorts with severe disease and in recent U.S. studies focused on ANE [4], highlighting that fatal outcomes remain possible even in modern tertiary centers.
One notable finding was the difference in influenza vaccination status across outcome groups. In particular, none of the patients in the mortality group had received influenza vaccination for at least 2 years before admission, whereas vaccination rates were higher in the sequelae and recovery groups. However, given the small-sample size and limited number of events, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and do not establish a causal relationship. In the multivariable analyses, although statistical significance was not achieved, the direction of the estimates was consistent with a potential association between prior vaccination and more favorable neurological outcomes. Previous studies have reported that lack of influenza vaccination is associated with an increased risk of neurological complications in children. Vaccination may attenuate viral load and modulate systemic inflammatory responses, potentially reducing the risk of excessive neuroinflammatory cascades that contribute to encephalitic injury. This interpretation is supported by previous epidemiological studies. In a large U.S. pediatric cohort, lack of seasonal influenza vaccination was independently associated with neurological complications (aOR, 1.6) [1]. Similarly, in a recent U.S. multicenter series of influenza-associated ANE, only 16% of patients had received age-appropriate seasonal influenza vaccination, highlighting low vaccine uptake among the most severe cases [4]. National surveillance data from the U.S. have also demonstrated that a substantial proportion of children with IAE or fatal influenza are unvaccinated, reinforcing the potential protective role of vaccination against severe neurological disease [4,9,10]. Moreover, vaccine-effectiveness studies have consistently shown that influenza vaccination reduces influenza-related hospitalizations and intensive care unit admissions in children, providing biological plausibility that vaccination may indirectly decrease the risk of catastrophic neurological outcomes by mitigating overall disease severity [11,12]. Japanese ecological analyses have suggested that discontinuation of influenza vaccination programs in schoolchildren was temporally associated with increased influenza-related mortality and severe IAE in children, supporting the broader public health impact of vaccination on the most severe pediatric outcomes [13]. Taken together, these findings suggest that influenza vaccination may be associated with differences in clinical severity, although further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify this relationship and determine whether a protective effect exists.
Treatment timing is clinically important in pediatric IAE. The first two fatal cases died before antiviral or immunomodulatory therapy could be initiated. After these early catastrophic cases, institutional practice shifted toward prompt treatment initiation in children with suspected IAE, even while diagnostic evaluations were ongoing. In subsequent patients, early therapy was associated with a protective trend in regression analyses. These findings support the possibility that IAE may involve a narrow therapeutic window during which early intervention could mitigate secondary immune-mediated brain injury. The findings remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis that excluded patients with hyperacute fatal progression before treatment initiation, supporting the robustness of the observed trends despite the limited sample size. Because antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies were initiated concurrently in this cohort, the independent effect of immunomodulatory therapy could not be determined.
The pathophysiology of IAE involves not only direct viral neuroinvasion but also an exaggerated systemic inflammatory response. Evidence suggests that dysregulated cytokine release, often described as a ‘cytokine storm,’ plays a central role in severe influenza-associated neurological injury [14-16]. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, have been reported in both serum and CSF from affected patients and are thought to disrupt the blood–brain barrier, promote cerebral edema, and trigger secondary neuronal injury [15,16]. Recent reports have suggested that tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, may be beneficial in severe cases such as ANE; however, none of the patients in this cohort received this treatment, and its clinical impact could not be evaluated in this study. In fulminant phenotypes such as ANE, symmetric deep gray matter lesions, particularly those involving the thalamus, are thought to reflect cytokine-mediated vascular and metabolic dysfunction rather than direct viral invasion [14,17]. Therefore, the hyperacute deterioration observed in some fatal cases may represent an overwhelming neuroinflammatory cascade occurring within a narrow therapeutic window. In the two fatal cases in this cohort, laboratory findings suggestive of multi-organ involvement, including elevated lactate and cardiac enzyme levels, were observed and may reflect rapid progression to systemic failure in fulminant IAE. This mechanism further supports the rationale for early antiviral therapy combined with timely immunomodulatory treatment in patients with suspected severe IAE [18].
Brainstem involvement on MRI and ventilator support was associated with increased odds of mortality, consistent with prior literature identifying deep gray matter and brainstem lesions as markers of severe disease. Although these associations did not reach statistical significance, likely because of the limited number of events, the direction of the findings is consistent with previous reports suggesting an association between brainstem involvement and disease severity.
This study had several limitations. First, the sample size was small, with only three death events, resulting in wide CIs and limited statistical power. To address potential small-sample bias and separation issues, Firth-penalized logistic regression was applied; however, the estimates remained imprecise and should be interpreted as exploratory. Second, this was a single-center retrospective study, and institutional practice patterns, particularly the shift toward earlier treatment after the initial fatal cases, may have influenced outcome comparisons. Third, treatment timing was not randomized, and residual confounding could not be excluded. Patients who received early therapy may have differed systematically from those who did not. Despite these limitations, the consistent direction of the observed associations, particularly for vaccination status and early treatment initiation, provides clinically meaningful signals that warrant further investigation in larger multicenter cohorts.
In conclusion, this single-center cohort study highlights that pediatric IAE, although many patients recover fully, can progress unpredictably and requires immediate clinical vigilance. Prompt recognition, early initiation of antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies, and reinforcement of influenza vaccination may help reduce severe neurological complications. Future multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these observations and better define optimal risk stratification and treatment timing in pediatric IAE.

Conflicts of interest

Sang Ook Nam is an editorial board member of the journal, but he was not involved in peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or the decision-making process for this article. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: SYL, SEP, and YJL. Data curation: JYO, SYL, TJL, YK, and YJL. Formal analysis: JK, SON, SEP, YMK, and GMY. Funding acquisition: YJL. Methodology: JK, TJL, YK, KJJ, and YJL. Project administration: JYO, SON, and YJL. Writing-original draft: JYO and YJL. Writing-review & editing: SYL, YMK, GMY, and YJL.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a 2025 research grant from Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital.

Fig. 1.
Diagnostic and treatment algorithm for influenza-associated encephalitis/encephalopathy. Patients with suspected IAE undergo diagnostic evaluation, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, laboratory studies, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, electroencephalography (EEG), and brain imaging. Disease severity is then categorized as mild, moderate, or severe, and treatment strategies are determined accordingly. ICU, intensive care unit.
acn-2026-01473f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Forest plot of multivariable Firth logistic regression analyses. (A) Risk factors for mortality (death vs. survival). (B) Risk factors for unfavorable neurological outcomes (mortality plus sequelae vs. recovery).
acn-2026-01473f2.jpg
Table 1.
Overview of published cohort studies on influenza-associated neurological complications in children
Study Country Period No. Definition Frequency Risk factors Outcome
USA (2021) [1] USA 2010–2017 1,217 New neurological manifestations 10.8% Comorbidity, ≤5 years Mostly recovery
Korea (2021) [5] Korea 2010–2017 1,988 New neurological symptoms 8.1% Neurological comorbidity 1.9% mortality
Thailand (2023) [3] Thailand 2013–2018 397 Neurological complications 16.9% Febrile seizure, epilepsy Some sequelae
France (2024) [2] France 2018–2023 71 IEC IAE criteria >10% Neurologic disorders Favorable
Vietnam (2024) [6] Vietnam 2018–2023 16 Abnormal mentality ≥24 hr Severe cases - 18.8% mortality
USA (2025) [4] USA 2023–2025 41 Radiologic acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE) ANE focus RANBP2 mutation 27% mortality

IEC, International Encephalitis Consortium; IAE, influenza-associated encephalitis/encephalopathy; RANBP2, RAN binding protein 2.

Table 2.
Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics according to the neurological outcome groups
Variable Mortality (n=3) Sequelae (n=4) Recovery (n=10) Total (n=17) P value
Age (yr) 8.9±2.8 9.7±4.2 7.2±2.5 8.1±3.0 0.343
Male sex 1 (33.3) 3 (75.0) 7 (70.0) 11 (64.7) 0.449
Underlying disease 0.185
 Epilepsy 0 0 1 (10.0) 1 (5.9)
 Moyamoya disease 0 1 (25.0) 0 1 (5.9)
Influenza vaccination 0a 2 (50.0) 10 (100.0) 12 (70.6) 0.011b
Influenza 0.058
 A (H3) 3 (100.0) 1 (25.0) 8 (80.0) 12 (70.6)
 B 0 3 (75.0) 2 (20.0) 5 (29.4)
Neurological symptoms
 Abnormal mentality 3 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 5 (50.0) 12 (70.6) 0.084
 Seizures 2 (66.7) 2 (50.0) 8 (80.0) 12 (70.6) 0.531
  Single seizure 1 (33.3) 0 1 (10.0) 2 (11.8) 0.529
  Recurrent seizures 1 (33.3) 2 (50.0) 7 (70.0) 10 (58.8) 0.485
  Status epilepticus 0 0 2 (20.0) 2 (11.8) 0.452
  ≥2 days 0 2 (50.0) 1 (10.0) 3 (17.6) 0.140
Treatment interval 0.003b
 <24 hr 0 1 (25.0) 8 (80.0) 9 (52.9)
 2nd-day 1 (33.3) 3 (75.0) 2 (20.0) 6 (35.3)
 Untreated 2 (66.7) 0 0 2 (11.8)
WBC (/mm3) 11.7±6.3 12.8±14.9 9.8±4.8 10.8±7.8 0.806
CRP (mg/dL) 1.2±1.1 1.8±2.7 3.0±4.8 2.4±3.9 0.761
AST (U/L) 610.3±439.8 44.8±17.3 181.3±285.7 224.9±327.6 0.051
ALT (U/L) 209.0±179.7 44.0±37.6 239.5±605.9 188.1±466.6 0.798
Cerebrospinal fluid ND
 WBC (/mm3) - 94.0±174.7 21.0±49.1 41.9±99.4 0.468
 Protein (mg/dL) - 52.4±16.6 41.6±41.8 44.7±36.0 0.632
 Glucose (mg/dL) - 65.0±6.9 71.1±16.5 69.4±14.4 0.498
Oseltamivir 1 (33.3) 2 (50.0) 9 (90.0) 12 (70.6) 0.098
IVIG 1 (33.3) 4 (100.0) 9 (90.0) 14 (82.4) 0.045b
IV methylprednisolone 1 (33.3) 4 (100.0) 10 (100.0) 15 (88.2) 0.005b
IV ASMs 1 (33.3) 2 (50.0) 1 (10.0) 4 (23.5) 0.255
PICU/Ventilator care 3 (100.0) 1 (25.0) 2 (20.0) 6 (35.3) 0.035b
Length of hospitalization (day) 1.2±0.8 19.2±1.9 12.1±2.8 11.9±6.3 <0.001b

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C-reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ND, not done; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; IV, intravenous; ASM, anti-seizure medication; PICU, pediatric intensive care unit.

aAll patients in the mortality group had not received influenza vaccination for at least 2 years;

bP<0.05 (mortality vs. sequelae vs. recovery).

Table 3.
Individual clinical and imaging characteristics of 17 patients with influenza-associated encephalitis/encephalopathy
No. Age (yr) Influenza type Vaccination Imaging (involving area) EEG Treatment interval IVIG mPD Outcome
1 11.2 H3 No (2023, 2024, 2025) Diffuse cerebral edema Diffuse suppression UA No No Died
2 9.7 H3 No (2024, 2025) Diffuse cerebral edema Diffuse suppression UA No No Died
3 8.4 H3 Yes Cerebral cortex DSA, slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes Recovered
4 6.4 H3 Yes Negative DSA, slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes Recovered
5 5.5 H3 Yes Negative DSA, slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes Recovered
6 9.4 B No (2025) Cerebral cortex DSA, slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes DM
7 7.8 H3 Yes Brainstem DSA, slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes Recovered
8 4.7 H3 Yes Negative DSA, slow BG 2nd day Yes Yes Recovered
9 11.5 H3 Yes Negative Slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes Recovered
10 3.7 H3 Yes Negative DSA, slow BG 2nd day Yes Yes Recovered
11 5.8 H3 No (2024, 2025) Brainstem, diffuse edema Diffuse suppression 2nd day Yes Yes Died
12 10.0 B Yes Cerebral cortex DSA, slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes Recovered
13 6.4 H3 Yes Negative DSA, slow BG 2nd day Yes Yes Epilepsy
14 7.2 B Yes Infarction, cortex, WM DSA, slow BG 2nd day Yes Yes Hemiplegia
15 5.5 H3 Yes Negative DSA, slow BG <24 hr No Yes Recovered
16 15.7 B No (2025) Negative DSA, slow BG 2nd day Yes Yes Epilepsy
17 8.3 B Yes Cerebral cortex DSA, slow BG <24 hr Yes Yes Recovered

EEG, electroencephalography; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; mPD, methylprednisolone; UA, unavailable; DSA, diffuse slow activity; BG, background activity; DM, diabetes mellitus; WM, white matter.

Table 4.
Multivariable Firth logistic regression analysis of risk factors for mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes
Outcome Predictor OR 95% CI P value
Mortality Vaccinated (yes vs. no) 0.47 0.01–27.98 0.718
Treatment interval <24 hr (yes vs. ≥24 hr/unknown) 0.21 0.01–8.23 0.400
Brainstem involvement on MRI (yes vs. no) 5.34 0.09–331.23 0.427
Ventilator support (yes vs. no) 6.79 0.12–370.55 0.348
Unfavorablea Vaccinated (yes vs. no) 0.10 0.00–6.19 0.269
Treatment interval <24 hr (yes vs. ≥24 hr/unknown) 0.15 0.01–2.64 0.196
Brainstem involvement on MRI (yes vs. no) 0.74 0.01–68.47 0.897
Ventilator support (yes vs. no) 1.53 0.03–77.39 0.832

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

aUnfavorable outcome, mortality plus sequelae group.

Table 5.
Sensitivity analysis of risk factors for unfavorable neurological outcomes excluding two hyperacute fatal cases
Outcome Predictor OR 95% CI P value
Unfavorablea Vaccinated (yes vs. no) 0.10 0.00–6.72 0.286
Treatment interval <24 hr (yes vs. ≥24 hr/unknown) 0.17 0.01–3.16 0.236
Brainstem involvement on MRI (yes vs. no) 0.79 0.01–110.74 0.925
Ventilator support (yes vs. no) 1.40 0.03–74.05 0.869

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

aUnfavorable outcome, mortality plus sequelae group after exclusion of two hyperacute fatal cases.

References

1. Frankl S, Coffin SE, Harrison JB, Swami SK, McGuire JL. Influenza-associated neurologic complications in hospitalized children. J Pediatr 2021;239:24-31.e1.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Savagner J, Tremeaux P, Baudou E, Mansuy JM, Cheuret E. Neurological involvement related to the influenza virus in children: a 5-year single-centre retrospective study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2024;51:100-9.
crossref pmid
3. Jantarabenjakul W, Paprad T, Paprad T, Anugulruengkitt S, Pancharoen C, Puthanakit T, et al. Neurological complications associated with influenza in hospitalized children. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2023;17:e13075.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Influenza-Associated Acute Necrotizing Encephalopathy (IA-ANE) Working Group; Silverman A, Walsh R, Santoro JD, Thomas K, Ballinger E, et al. Influenza-associated acute necrotizing encephalopathy in US children. JAMA 2025;334:692-701.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Choi GJ, Park JY, Choi JS, Choi SR, Kim D, Lee JH, et al. Influenza-associated neurologic complications in hospitalized pediatric patients: a multicenter retrospective study in Republic of Korea. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021;40:e466-71.
crossref pmid
6. Nguyen LV, Nguyen DS, Pham QT, Do HT, Tran DM, Cao TV, et al. Clinical features and treatment outcomes of influenza-associated encephalitis and encephalopathy: a study on 16 children in Vietnam. Glob Pediatr Health 2024;11:2333794X241286549.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Uyeki TM. Pediatric influenza-associated acute necrotizing encephalopathy: gaps need to be addressed. JAMA 2025;334:677-9.
crossref pmid
8. Messacar K, Fischer M, Dominguez SR, Tyler KL, Abzug MJ. Encephalitis in US children. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2018;32:145-62.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Fazal A, Harker EJ, Neelam V, Olson SM, Rolfes MA, Reinhart K, et al. Pediatric influenza-associated encephalopathy and acute necrotizing encephalopathy: United States, 2024–25 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2025;74:556-64.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Fazal A, Reinhart K, Huang S, Kniss K, Olson SM, Dugan VG, et al. Reports of encephalopathy among children with influenza-associated mortality: United States, 2010–11 through 2024–25 influenza seasons. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2025;74:91-5.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Sumner KM, Sahni LC, Boom JA, Halasa NB, Stewart LS, Englund JA, et al. Estimated vaccine effectiveness for pediatric patients with severe influenza, 2015-2020. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e2452512.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Tenforde MW, Reeves EL, Weber ZA, Tartof SY, Klein NP, Dascomb K, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness against hospitalizations and emergency department or urgent care encounters for children, adolescents, and adults during the 2023–2024 season, United States. Clin Infect Dis 2025;81:667-78.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Ono S, Kudo M, Aoki K, Ezaki F, Misumi J. Effect of mass immunization against influenza encephalopathy on mortality rates in children. Pediatr Int 2003;45:680-7.
crossref pmid
14. Mizuguchi M. Acute necrotizing encephalopathy of childhood: a novel form of acute encephalopathy prevalent in Japan and Taiwan. Brain Dev 1997;19:81-92.
crossref pmid
15. Ichiyama T, Isumi H, Ozawa H, Matsubara T, Morishima T, Furukawa S. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of cytokines in influenza-associated encephalopathy. Scand J Infect Dis 2003;35:59-61.
pmid
16. Sun R, Zhang X, Hou J, Jia W, Li P, Wang D, et al. Predictive value of il-6 and lymphocyte subsets for death in children with influenza-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective study. Mediators Inflamm 2024 Nov 23 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1155/mi/5564727
crossref
17. Neilson DE, Adams MD, Orr CM, Schelling DK, Eiben RM, Kerr DS, et al. Infection-triggered familial or recurrent cases of acute necrotizing encephalopathy caused by mutations in RANBP2. Am J Hum Genet 2009;84:44-51.
pmid pmc
18. Gu Y, Zuo X, Zhang S, Ouyang Z, Jiang S, Wang F, et al. The mechanism behind influenza virus cytokine storm. Viruses 2021;13:1362.
crossref


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
372, Hangang-daero, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04323, Republic of Korea 703, Building A, Centreville Asterium Seoul
Tel: +82-2-2138-3303    Fax: +82-2-743-3455    E-mail: editor@annchildneurol.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Child Neurology Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next